Skip to main content

Perfect Answers

As I sought to capture the details of "my" beliefs upon the pages of my Doctrinal Position paper, I found myself stupefied by the plethora of possible perspectives on any given topic addressed within my Systematic Theology class; from traducianism to semi-apolonarianism the possibilities are endless. I am struck by theologians diligent resolve to not only hold any given view with such regard so as to author, books and dedicate their lives work to defending their perspective, but to their confident proliferation of didactic literature so as to birth the next generation of Augustinian, traditional-dispensational, psychopannychism, continuationist zealots. It is remarkable to think they defend these nuanced branches of theology with such resolve, in spite of the countless alternatives with equally formidable scriptural support and logical foundation. How one comes to a conclusion on any of these issues is beyond my comprehension. Perhaps, my dedication to truth without compromise has paralyzed my ability to function out of fear that I might choose the wrong concept. I have been reminded of what a friend once told me:


"I used to think I needed to hold out for the ultimate cause, the biggest scheme, the most difficult task, the greatest burden... only problem is that there is no such thing and I was being cleverly paralyzed and left innocuous. I wanted to turn the world upside down. But I needed to be turned upside down instead. Now I just pray to be faithful when I sit down to write a friend on facebook... :) There may never be great fanfare in my life and there are no perfect causes. I'm learning to be PERFECTED instead of looking for perfection in this crazy world. So translation for right now: I'm committed to things that God has put in my life... my family, school, PCM, dorm friends, and church. They're not ideal, but what's idealism if it isn't a cop out on life??"


Maybe I will never have a perfect theology for life, but perhaps I can settle for an achievable philosophy. 

Popular posts from this blog

Sobriety

A man who has tasted love but once is afflicted indeed; but not as severely as he who knows not loss. If I told you I do not enjoy the trappings of money, a good drink and fine cigar, I would surely be lying for I am but human. However, If I knew that the forsaking any or all of these indulgences would assure or possibly extend to just one man the pleasure which I derive from God’s love, I would without hesitation due so, even for the remainder of my life. Furthermore, if by indulging in any or all of these pleasures I knew I was precluding even one man from the love of God I assure any pleasure I would have derived would be replaced with incomparable agony. Beyond this if one is to truly embrace and experience the pleasure of God’s love he must not only be willing to forsake the pleasures of life, but even embrace the expense of suffering. For without tasting the cost, how can we genuinely suggest the value?

Doubt

I grew up much too prideful to ask those questions of doubt, those legitimate and sweet to the lips questions of existential importance…"God...why?” I had been trained from such a young age that these questions only lead to further confusion and misunderstanding, that we ask these out of ignorance and foolishness. That if we were wise enough, patient enough and sinless enough we wouldn’t doubt God. We would not feel compelled to ask these questions, instead we would have the all surpassing peace of the Holy Spirit to abide. For to ask such a question of why God does something or if God even exists, is to admit that your faith is weak. Which we all know from Bible lessons of young, a weak faith means a weak mind and an even weaker knowledge of God. Even scripture affirms the pursuit of God is the beginning of knowledge and blessed is he who finds it. So how can I ask these foolish questions twenty-one years into my faith? The answer is simple…you don’t. Instead you conjecture, deba...

Rivers Born of Indelible Collisions

Rivers aren’t built for water, but water for making rivers. Rivers aren’t made but born of the earth which must give way to the whims of water They were not planned Nor designed But hewn By the wayward The unbridled The indelible The life giver The source Water is natures inevitability The unguided architect The directionless artist Earth is the canvas Water the sculpture History the muse The rock must give way The earth must cave Unbiased and unevulsed I had it backwards, I though in order to live life I must plan for events before they occur, discerning my trajectory before life’s imposition affected my decision. I perceived and conceptualized my conclusion, thus reversely mapped the necessary steps required to preserve my construct. Yet, the conclusion holds no luster if the journey imprints no affect. Influence is the very nature of decision, judging your desires from the disjunctives that present themselves, rather than extrapolating the choice from theoretical disj...